← Back to the site

Warehouse Analytics · One-page summary

Where does a beverage warehouse lose money?

Real beer and keg volumes (Montgomery County, Jun/17 to Aug/26, 27 months of data). Simulated damage and prices; ranges from 120 simulations with varying assumptions.

R$210.2K

Estimated loss per month

0.84%

Of cases moved

9/16

reason × stage combinations explain 80% of the loss

Real data · no simulation

3 findings (simulated layer)

  1. 46%1. of the loss comes from 3 combinations. Handling breakage at picking, pallet fall at loading and handling breakage at loading. Across simulations it ranges 43%–50%; it depends mostly on how much damage happens at picking.
  2. 80%2. of the cost is long neck. Glass is 51% of the volume and is damaged 2.4× as often as cans. The most robust finding: 76%–84% across every assumption range.
  3. +46%3. at picking, mix-adjusted. The raw rate shows +31% and makes the other stages look better, but that is just glass being replaced by cans (adjusted: −1%). The simulation plants +45%, and the method recovers it.

Each action comes from a finding and shows its estimated savings, assuming a 30% reduction.

Picking: handling and split casesHandling training, plastic crates for split glass cases and a review of picking pace, where the loss is growing.R$26,964 per month
Long neck: pallet protectionCorner boards and extra stretch film on glass pallets, and no mixing of cans and glass when building loads.R$50,371 per month
Loading and storage: standardsA load-securing standard at loading and a stacking limit marked at each location, against pallet falls and over-stacking.R$26,874 per month on the top 3 combinations
Metric: mix-adjusted rateTrack damage with the packaging mix held fixed. The raw rate improves on its own when sales shift to cans and hides the worsening at picking.A target the mix cannot fool